From 8b45597a9a24925b3a62c4fe793661bfbc682bcc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stef Walter Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 00:00:04 +0000 Subject: Add MIBS that we distribute with the app. --- mibs/SNMPv2-TC.txt | 772 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 772 insertions(+) create mode 100644 mibs/SNMPv2-TC.txt (limited to 'mibs/SNMPv2-TC.txt') diff --git a/mibs/SNMPv2-TC.txt b/mibs/SNMPv2-TC.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..860bf71 --- /dev/null +++ b/mibs/SNMPv2-TC.txt @@ -0,0 +1,772 @@ +SNMPv2-TC DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN + +IMPORTS + TimeTicks FROM SNMPv2-SMI; + +-- definition of textual conventions + +TEXTUAL-CONVENTION MACRO ::= + +BEGIN + TYPE NOTATION ::= + DisplayPart + "STATUS" Status + "DESCRIPTION" Text + ReferPart + "SYNTAX" Syntax + + VALUE NOTATION ::= + value(VALUE Syntax) -- adapted ASN.1 + + DisplayPart ::= + "DISPLAY-HINT" Text + | empty + + Status ::= + "current" + | "deprecated" + | "obsolete" + + ReferPart ::= + "REFERENCE" Text + | empty + + -- a character string as defined in [2] + Text ::= value(IA5String) + + Syntax ::= -- Must be one of the following: + -- a base type (or its refinement), or + -- a BITS pseudo-type + type + | "BITS" "{" NamedBits "}" + + NamedBits ::= NamedBit + | NamedBits "," NamedBit + + NamedBit ::= identifier "(" number ")" -- number is nonnegative + +END + +DisplayString ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION + DISPLAY-HINT "255a" + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "Represents textual information taken from the NVT ASCII + + character set, as defined in pages 4, 10-11 of RFC 854. + + To summarize RFC 854, the NVT ASCII repertoire specifies: + + - the use of character codes 0-127 (decimal) + + - the graphics characters (32-126) are interpreted as + US ASCII + + - NUL, LF, CR, BEL, BS, HT, VT and FF have the special + meanings specified in RFC 854 + + - the other 25 codes have no standard interpretation + + - the sequence 'CR LF' means newline + + - the sequence 'CR NUL' means carriage-return + + - an 'LF' not preceded by a 'CR' means moving to the + same column on the next line. + + - the sequence 'CR x' for any x other than LF or NUL is + illegal. (Note that this also means that a string may + end with either 'CR LF' or 'CR NUL', but not with CR.) + + Any object defined using this syntax may not exceed 255 + characters in length." + SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (0..255)) + +PhysAddress ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION + DISPLAY-HINT "1x:" + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "Represents media- or physical-level addresses." + SYNTAX OCTET STRING + +MacAddress ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION + DISPLAY-HINT "1x:" + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "Represents an 802 MAC address represented in the + `canonical' order defined by IEEE 802.1a, i.e., as if it + were transmitted least significant bit first, even though + 802.5 (in contrast to other 802.x protocols) requires MAC + addresses to be transmitted most significant bit first." + SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (6)) + +TruthValue ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "Represents a boolean value." + SYNTAX INTEGER { true(1), false(2) } + +TestAndIncr ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "Represents integer-valued information used for atomic + operations. When the management protocol is used to specify + that an object instance having this syntax is to be + modified, the new value supplied via the management protocol + must precisely match the value presently held by the + instance. If not, the management protocol set operation + fails with an error of `inconsistentValue'. Otherwise, if + the current value is the maximum value of 2^31-1 (2147483647 + decimal), then the value held by the instance is wrapped to + zero; otherwise, the value held by the instance is + incremented by one. (Note that regardless of whether the + management protocol set operation succeeds, the variable- + binding in the request and response PDUs are identical.) + + The value of the ACCESS clause for objects having this + syntax is either `read-write' or `read-create'. When an + instance of a columnar object having this syntax is created, + any value may be supplied via the management protocol. + + When the network management portion of the system is re- + initialized, the value of every object instance having this + syntax must either be incremented from its value prior to + the re-initialization, or (if the value prior to the re- + initialization is unknown) be set to a pseudo-randomly + generated value." + SYNTAX INTEGER (0..2147483647) + +AutonomousType ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "Represents an independently extensible type identification + value. It may, for example, indicate a particular sub-tree + with further MIB definitions, or define a particular type of + protocol or hardware." + SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER + +InstancePointer ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION + STATUS obsolete + DESCRIPTION + "A pointer to either a specific instance of a MIB object or + a conceptual row of a MIB table in the managed device. In + the latter case, by convention, it is the name of the + particular instance of the first accessible columnar object + in the conceptual row. + + The two uses of this textual convention are replaced by + VariablePointer and RowPointer, respectively." + SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER + +VariablePointer ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "A pointer to a specific object instance. For example, + sysContact.0 or ifInOctets.3." + SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER + +RowPointer ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "Represents a pointer to a conceptual row. The value is the + name of the instance of the first accessible columnar object + in the conceptual row. + + For example, ifIndex.3 would point to the 3rd row in the + ifTable (note that if ifIndex were not-accessible, then + ifDescr.3 would be used instead)." + SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER + +RowStatus ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The RowStatus textual convention is used to manage the + creation and deletion of conceptual rows, and is used as the + value of the SYNTAX clause for the status column of a + conceptual row (as described in Section 7.7.1 of [2].) + + The status column has six defined values: + + - `active', which indicates that the conceptual row is + available for use by the managed device; + + - `notInService', which indicates that the conceptual + row exists in the agent, but is unavailable for use by + the managed device (see NOTE below); 'notInService' has + no implication regarding the internal consistency of + the row, availability of resources, or consistency with + the current state of the managed device; + + - `notReady', which indicates that the conceptual row + exists in the agent, but is missing information + necessary in order to be available for use by the + managed device (i.e., one or more required columns in + the conceptual row have not been instanciated); + + - `createAndGo', which is supplied by a management + station wishing to create a new instance of a + conceptual row and to have its status automatically set + to active, making it available for use by the managed + device; + + - `createAndWait', which is supplied by a management + station wishing to create a new instance of a + conceptual row (but not make it available for use by + the managed device); and, + - `destroy', which is supplied by a management station + wishing to delete all of the instances associated with + an existing conceptual row. + + Whereas five of the six values (all except `notReady') may + be specified in a management protocol set operation, only + three values will be returned in response to a management + protocol retrieval operation: `notReady', `notInService' or + `active'. That is, when queried, an existing conceptual row + has only three states: it is either available for use by + the managed device (the status column has value `active'); + it is not available for use by the managed device, though + the agent has sufficient information to attempt to make it + so (the status column has value `notInService'); or, it is + not available for use by the managed device, and an attempt + to make it so would fail because the agent has insufficient + information (the state column has value `notReady'). + + NOTE WELL + + This textual convention may be used for a MIB table, + irrespective of whether the values of that table's + conceptual rows are able to be modified while it is + active, or whether its conceptual rows must be taken + out of service in order to be modified. That is, it is + the responsibility of the DESCRIPTION clause of the + status column to specify whether the status column must + not be `active' in order for the value of some other + column of the same conceptual row to be modified. If + such a specification is made, affected columns may be + changed by an SNMP set PDU if the RowStatus would not + be equal to `active' either immediately before or after + processing the PDU. In other words, if the PDU also + contained a varbind that would change the RowStatus + value, the column in question may be changed if the + RowStatus was not equal to `active' as the PDU was + received, or if the varbind sets the status to a value + other than 'active'. + + Also note that whenever any elements of a row exist, the + RowStatus column must also exist. + + To summarize the effect of having a conceptual row with a + status column having a SYNTAX clause value of RowStatus, + consider the following state diagram: + + STATE + +--------------+-----------+-------------+------------- + | A | B | C | D + | |status col.|status column| + |status column | is | is |status column + ACTION |does not exist| notReady | notInService| is active +--------------+--------------+-----------+-------------+------------- +set status |noError ->D|inconsist- |inconsistent-|inconsistent- +column to | or | entValue| Value| Value +createAndGo |inconsistent- | | | + | Value| | | +--------------+--------------+-----------+-------------+------------- +set status |noError see 1|inconsist- |inconsistent-|inconsistent- +column to | or | entValue| Value| Value +createAndWait |wrongValue | | | +--------------+--------------+-----------+-------------+------------- +set status |inconsistent- |inconsist- |noError |noError +column to | Value| entValue| | +active | | | | + | | or | | + | | | | + | |see 2 ->D|see 8 ->D| ->D +--------------+--------------+-----------+-------------+------------- +set status |inconsistent- |inconsist- |noError |noError ->C +column to | Value| entValue| | +notInService | | | | + | | or | | or + | | | | + | |see 3 ->C| ->C|see 6 +--------------+--------------+-----------+-------------+------------- +set status |noError |noError |noError |noError ->A +column to | | | | or +destroy | ->A| ->A| ->A|see 7 +--------------+--------------+-----------+-------------+------------- +set any other |see 4 |noError |noError |see 5 +column to some| | | | +value | | see 1| ->C| ->D +--------------+--------------+-----------+-------------+------------- + + (1) goto B or C, depending on information available to the + agent. + + (2) if other variable bindings included in the same PDU, + provide values for all columns which are missing but + required, and all columns have acceptable values, then + return noError and goto D. + + (3) if other variable bindings included in the same PDU, + provide legal values for all columns which are missing but + required, then return noError and goto C. + + (4) at the discretion of the agent, the return value may be + either: + + inconsistentName: because the agent does not choose to + create such an instance when the corresponding + RowStatus instance does not exist, or + + inconsistentValue: if the supplied value is + inconsistent with the state of some other MIB object's + value, or + + noError: because the agent chooses to create the + instance. + + If noError is returned, then the instance of the status + column must also be created, and the new state is B or C, + depending on the information available to the agent. If + inconsistentName or inconsistentValue is returned, the row + remains in state A. + + (5) depending on the MIB definition for the column/table, + either noError or inconsistentValue may be returned. + + (6) the return value can indicate one of the following + errors: + + wrongValue: because the agent does not support + notInService (e.g., an agent which does not support + createAndWait), or + + inconsistentValue: because the agent is unable to take + the row out of service at this time, perhaps because it + is in use and cannot be de-activated. + + (7) the return value can indicate the following error: + + inconsistentValue: because the agent is unable to + remove the row at this time, perhaps because it is in + use and cannot be de-activated. + + (8) the transition to D can fail, e.g., if the values of the + conceptual row are inconsistent, then the error code would + be inconsistentValue. + + NOTE: Other processing of (this and other varbinds of) the + set request may result in a response other than noError + being returned, e.g., wrongValue, noCreation, etc. + + Conceptual Row Creation + + There are four potential interactions when creating a + conceptual row: selecting an instance-identifier which is + not in use; creating the conceptual row; initializing any + objects for which the agent does not supply a default; and, + making the conceptual row available for use by the managed + device. + + Interaction 1: Selecting an Instance-Identifier + + The algorithm used to select an instance-identifier varies + for each conceptual row. In some cases, the instance- + identifier is semantically significant, e.g., the + destination address of a route, and a management station + selects the instance-identifier according to the semantics. + + In other cases, the instance-identifier is used solely to + distinguish conceptual rows, and a management station + without specific knowledge of the conceptual row might + examine the instances present in order to determine an + unused instance-identifier. (This approach may be used, but + it is often highly sub-optimal; however, it is also a + questionable practice for a naive management station to + attempt conceptual row creation.) + + Alternately, the MIB module which defines the conceptual row + might provide one or more objects which provide assistance + in determining an unused instance-identifier. For example, + if the conceptual row is indexed by an integer-value, then + an object having an integer-valued SYNTAX clause might be + defined for such a purpose, allowing a management station to + issue a management protocol retrieval operation. In order + to avoid unnecessary collisions between competing management + stations, `adjacent' retrievals of this object should be + different. + + Finally, the management station could select a pseudo-random + number to use as the index. In the event that this index + + was already in use and an inconsistentValue was returned in + response to the management protocol set operation, the + management station should simply select a new pseudo-random + number and retry the operation. + + A MIB designer should choose between the two latter + algorithms based on the size of the table (and therefore the + efficiency of each algorithm). For tables in which a large + number of entries are expected, it is recommended that a MIB + object be defined that returns an acceptable index for + creation. For tables with small numbers of entries, it is + recommended that the latter pseudo-random index mechanism be + used. + + Interaction 2: Creating the Conceptual Row + + Once an unused instance-identifier has been selected, the + management station determines if it wishes to create and + activate the conceptual row in one transaction or in a + negotiated set of interactions. + + Interaction 2a: Creating and Activating the Conceptual Row + + The management station must first determine the column + requirements, i.e., it must determine those columns for + which it must or must not provide values. Depending on the + complexity of the table and the management station's + knowledge of the agent's capabilities, this determination + can be made locally by the management station. Alternately, + the management station issues a management protocol get + operation to examine all columns in the conceptual row that + it wishes to create. In response, for each column, there + are three possible outcomes: + + - a value is returned, indicating that some other + management station has already created this conceptual + row. We return to interaction 1. + + - the exception `noSuchInstance' is returned, + indicating that the agent implements the object-type + associated with this column, and that this column in at + least one conceptual row would be accessible in the MIB + view used by the retrieval were it to exist. For those + columns to which the agent provides read-create access, + the `noSuchInstance' exception tells the management + station that it should supply a value for this column + when the conceptual row is to be created. + + - the exception `noSuchObject' is returned, indicating + that the agent does not implement the object-type + associated with this column or that there is no + conceptual row for which this column would be + accessible in the MIB view used by the retrieval. As + such, the management station can not issue any + management protocol set operations to create an + instance of this column. + + Once the column requirements have been determined, a + management protocol set operation is accordingly issued. + This operation also sets the new instance of the status + column to `createAndGo'. + + When the agent processes the set operation, it verifies that + it has sufficient information to make the conceptual row + available for use by the managed device. The information + available to the agent is provided by two sources: the + management protocol set operation which creates the + conceptual row, and, implementation-specific defaults + supplied by the agent (note that an agent must provide + implementation-specific defaults for at least those objects + which it implements as read-only). If there is sufficient + information available, then the conceptual row is created, a + `noError' response is returned, the status column is set to + `active', and no further interactions are necessary (i.e., + interactions 3 and 4 are skipped). If there is insufficient + information, then the conceptual row is not created, and the + set operation fails with an error of `inconsistentValue'. + On this error, the management station can issue a management + protocol retrieval operation to determine if this was + because it failed to specify a value for a required column, + or, because the selected instance of the status column + already existed. In the latter case, we return to + interaction 1. In the former case, the management station + can re-issue the set operation with the additional + information, or begin interaction 2 again using + `createAndWait' in order to negotiate creation of the + conceptual row. + + NOTE WELL + + Regardless of the method used to determine the column + requirements, it is possible that the management + station might deem a column necessary when, in fact, + the agent will not allow that particular columnar + instance to be created or written. In this case, the + management protocol set operation will fail with an + error such as `noCreation' or `notWritable'. In this + case, the management station decides whether it needs + to be able to set a value for that particular columnar + instance. If not, the management station re-issues the + management protocol set operation, but without setting + a value for that particular columnar instance; + otherwise, the management station aborts the row + creation algorithm. + + Interaction 2b: Negotiating the Creation of the Conceptual + Row + + The management station issues a management protocol set + operation which sets the desired instance of the status + column to `createAndWait'. If the agent is unwilling to + process a request of this sort, the set operation fails with + an error of `wrongValue'. (As a consequence, such an agent + must be prepared to accept a single management protocol set + operation, i.e., interaction 2a above, containing all of the + columns indicated by its column requirements.) Otherwise, + the conceptual row is created, a `noError' response is + returned, and the status column is immediately set to either + `notInService' or `notReady', depending on whether it has + sufficient information to (attempt to) make the conceptual + row available for use by the managed device. If there is + sufficient information available, then the status column is + set to `notInService'; otherwise, if there is insufficient + information, then the status column is set to `notReady'. + Regardless, we proceed to interaction 3. + + Interaction 3: Initializing non-defaulted Objects + + The management station must now determine the column + requirements. It issues a management protocol get operation + to examine all columns in the created conceptual row. In + the response, for each column, there are three possible + outcomes: + + - a value is returned, indicating that the agent + implements the object-type associated with this column + and had sufficient information to provide a value. For + those columns to which the agent provides read-create + access (and for which the agent allows their values to + be changed after their creation), a value return tells + the management station that it may issue additional + management protocol set operations, if it desires, in + order to change the value associated with this column. + + - the exception `noSuchInstance' is returned, + indicating that the agent implements the object-type + associated with this column, and that this column in at + least one conceptual row would be accessible in the MIB + view used by the retrieval were it to exist. However, + the agent does not have sufficient information to + provide a value, and until a value is provided, the + conceptual row may not be made available for use by the + managed device. For those columns to which the agent + provides read-create access, the `noSuchInstance' + exception tells the management station that it must + issue additional management protocol set operations, in + order to provide a value associated with this column. + + - the exception `noSuchObject' is returned, indicating + that the agent does not implement the object-type + associated with this column or that there is no + conceptual row for which this column would be + accessible in the MIB view used by the retrieval. As + such, the management station can not issue any + management protocol set operations to create an + instance of this column. + + If the value associated with the status column is + `notReady', then the management station must first deal with + all `noSuchInstance' columns, if any. Having done so, the + value of the status column becomes `notInService', and we + proceed to interaction 4. + + Interaction 4: Making the Conceptual Row Available + + Once the management station is satisfied with the values + associated with the columns of the conceptual row, it issues + a management protocol set operation to set the status column + to `active'. If the agent has sufficient information to + make the conceptual row available for use by the managed + device, the management protocol set operation succeeds (a + `noError' response is returned). Otherwise, the management + protocol set operation fails with an error of + `inconsistentValue'. + + NOTE WELL + + A conceptual row having a status column with value + `notInService' or `notReady' is unavailable to the + managed device. As such, it is possible for the + managed device to create its own instances during the + time between the management protocol set operation + which sets the status column to `createAndWait' and the + management protocol set operation which sets the status + column to `active'. In this case, when the management + protocol set operation is issued to set the status + column to `active', the values held in the agent + supersede those used by the managed device. + + If the management station is prevented from setting the + status column to `active' (e.g., due to management station + or network failure) the conceptual row will be left in the + `notInService' or `notReady' state, consuming resources + indefinitely. The agent must detect conceptual rows that + have been in either state for an abnormally long period of + time and remove them. It is the responsibility of the + DESCRIPTION clause of the status column to indicate what an + abnormally long period of time would be. This period of + time should be long enough to allow for human response time + (including `think time') between the creation of the + conceptual row and the setting of the status to `active'. + In the absence of such information in the DESCRIPTION + clause, it is suggested that this period be approximately 5 + minutes in length. This removal action applies not only to + newly-created rows, but also to previously active rows which + are set to, and left in, the notInService state for a + prolonged period exceeding that which is considered normal + for such a conceptual row. + + Conceptual Row Suspension + + When a conceptual row is `active', the management station + may issue a management protocol set operation which sets the + instance of the status column to `notInService'. If the + agent is unwilling to do so, the set operation fails with an + error of `wrongValue' or `inconsistentValue'. Otherwise, + the conceptual row is taken out of service, and a `noError' + response is returned. It is the responsibility of the + DESCRIPTION clause of the status column to indicate under + what circumstances the status column should be taken out of + service (e.g., in order for the value of some other column + of the same conceptual row to be modified). + + Conceptual Row Deletion + + For deletion of conceptual rows, a management protocol set + operation is issued which sets the instance of the status + column to `destroy'. This request may be made regardless of + the current value of the status column (e.g., it is possible + to delete conceptual rows which are either `notReady', + `notInService' or `active'.) If the operation succeeds, + then all instances associated with the conceptual row are + immediately removed." + SYNTAX INTEGER { + -- the following two values are states: + -- these values may be read or written + active(1), + notInService(2), + -- the following value is a state: + -- this value may be read, but not written + notReady(3), + -- the following three values are + -- actions: these values may be written, + -- but are never read + createAndGo(4), + createAndWait(5), + destroy(6) + } + +TimeStamp ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The value of the sysUpTime object at which a specific + occurrence happened. The specific occurrence must be + + defined in the description of any object defined using this + type. + + If sysUpTime is reset to zero as a result of a re- + initialization of the network management (sub)system, then + the values of all TimeStamp objects are also reset. + However, after approximately 497 days without a re- + initialization, the sysUpTime object will reach 2^^32-1 and + then increment around to zero; in this case, existing values + of TimeStamp objects do not change. This can lead to + ambiguities in the value of TimeStamp objects." + SYNTAX TimeTicks + +TimeInterval ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "A period of time, measured in units of 0.01 seconds." + SYNTAX INTEGER (0..2147483647) + +DateAndTime ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION + DISPLAY-HINT "2d-1d-1d,1d:1d:1d.1d,1a1d:1d" + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "A date-time specification. + + field octets contents range + ----- ------ -------- ----- + 1 1-2 year* 0..65536 + 2 3 month 1..12 + 3 4 day 1..31 + 4 5 hour 0..23 + 5 6 minutes 0..59 + 6 7 seconds 0..60 + (use 60 for leap-second) + 7 8 deci-seconds 0..9 + 8 9 direction from UTC '+' / '-' + 9 10 hours from UTC* 0..13 + 10 11 minutes from UTC 0..59 + + * Notes: + - the value of year is in network-byte order + - daylight saving time in New Zealand is +13 + + For example, Tuesday May 26, 1992 at 1:30:15 PM EDT would be + displayed as: + + 1992-5-26,13:30:15.0,-4:0 + + Note that if only local time is known, then timezone + information (fields 8-10) is not present." + SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (8 | 11)) + +StorageType ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "Describes the memory realization of a conceptual row. A + row which is volatile(2) is lost upon reboot. A row which + is either nonVolatile(3), permanent(4) or readOnly(5), is + backed up by stable storage. A row which is permanent(4) + can be changed but not deleted. A row which is readOnly(5) + cannot be changed nor deleted. + + If the value of an object with this syntax is either + permanent(4) or readOnly(5), it cannot be written. + Conversely, if the value is either other(1), volatile(2) or + nonVolatile(3), it cannot be modified to be permanent(4) or + readOnly(5). (All illegal modifications result in a + 'wrongValue' error.) + + Every usage of this textual convention is required to + specify the columnar objects which a permanent(4) row must + at a minimum allow to be writable." + SYNTAX INTEGER { + other(1), -- eh? + volatile(2), -- e.g., in RAM + nonVolatile(3), -- e.g., in NVRAM + permanent(4), -- e.g., partially in ROM + readOnly(5) -- e.g., completely in ROM + } + +TDomain ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "Denotes a kind of transport service. + + Some possible values, such as snmpUDPDomain, are defined in + the SNMPv2-TM MIB module. Other possible values are defined + in other MIB modules." + REFERENCE "The SNMPv2-TM MIB module is defined in RFC 1906." + SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER + +TAddress ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "Denotes a transport service address. + + A TAddress value is always interpreted within the context of a + TDomain value. Thus, each definition of a TDomain value must + be accompanied by a definition of a textual convention for use + with that TDomain. Some possible textual conventions, such as + SnmpUDPAddress for snmpUDPDomain, are defined in the SNMPv2-TM + MIB module. Other possible textual conventions are defined in + other MIB modules." + REFERENCE "The SNMPv2-TM MIB module is defined in RFC 1906." + SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (1..255)) + +END -- cgit v1.2.3